All papers are checked via
|← College||My First Year in College →|
With due respect to the topic on emotional health as conducted in the survey on freshmen attending various colleges, the need for an initial understanding of emotional health is therefore inevitable. One is introduced to the tendency of feeling protected, relaxed and stable from everyday living as being the most essential constituents of a healthy emotional state. In addition students who refrain from a violent response towards difficult situations and portray the above are bound to be characterized as emotionally sound. But owing to economic hardships, futuristic dilemmas and gender implications as depicted in the survey, it is therefore appropriate to support a thesis statement implying that freshmen's emotional stability is on the decrease.
The survey that has since been dubbed The American Freshmen: National Norms Fall 2010 can be credited with being precisely outstanding and up to task as seen by the various factors put into consideration during the entire survey period. Conducted on more than 200,000 students who joined colleges that offer 4 year courses and being full time students qualifies most of the information gathered considering the scope of engagement. The focal point of the survey is dependent on information gathered by the students themselves on how they feel about their emotional conditions as compared to that of others. With a huge percentage of students testifying that their emotional status is below average the issue becomes evident since sound emotions rarely drive an individual to discredit themselves.
They would instead portray a high esteem and feel secure with themselves. The other factor entailing a decrease in the percentage of students with above par emotional status, combined with the above, contribute to the confirmation of this survey's effectiveness as ascertained by what counselors on campus facilities experience on a daily basis. Psychologists attending to students on campuses point towards emerging evidence suggesting that most students are experiencing stress, depression and taking medication for emotional problems. The most worrying part of it is the fact that these students are admitted to campus with the conditions already existent. This suggests that the problem can be traced back to the final years of high school.
As pointed out in the survey, economic difficulties are indeed a contributing factor to decline in emotional health. Most students have been found to worry a lot about the financial position of their parents and their loan repayment ability in relation to the seemingly tough times ahead after school. These emotional difficulties originating from an unbearable economy have therefore prompted many students to go for loans. "We do not know exactly why student's emotional health is declining but it seems the economy could be a lot of it"(Tamar A1). There seems to be much pointing towards the economy in the survey and it is supported in the sense that "paternal unemployment is at the highest level since we started measuring". Therefore students experiencing the above cycles together with having to contemplate the choice of college to attend and the financial implications are bound to weaken their emotional stamina. In turn this drives them to opting for financial assistance without forgetting the inability to acquire part time jobs in this day and age. This survey is also qualified as legitimate considering the fact that it is an ongoing process since way back in 1984 and thus the various statistics collected from a vast population of freshmen across the country leaves very little doubt.
As Bryan Van Brunt implies, "this fits with all we are seeing"(Tamar, A1). Many students are entering college with existent emotional complications thanks to economic problems and tolerance levels as exhibited in regard to gender. From the survey pointing out that the gender issue turned out to be more conspicuous as compared to the main component of research, it is therefore quite accurate judging from the side effects originating from the survey. A smaller percentage of male students (18%) openly certified to having been inundated by the final year in high school and subsequent periods at college, as compared to 39% of female students who admitted to the same. Counselors on college facilities have also noted that female students remain the most vulnerable to emotional degradation as they form about 60% of all mental health patients visiting the facilities.
In addition, female students have proven to the experts in the survey that they are less likely able to keep emotional problems to themselves and will instead pour their hearts out as compared to their male counterparts who will keep to themselves for the better part of its existence. The above sentiment is well supported in the survey owing to the various manners in which people from the two forms of gender spend their free time. The way we spend our free time is instrumental in determining how fast we can divert our attention from stress enhancing factors. It is true that boys will spend most of their leisure time engaging in sports and other forms of exercise and in turn avoid the occurrence of emotional problems. Girls on the other hand are bound to choose other activities that are useful in one way or the other but less effective in curbing emotional health problems. These activities may include cleaning, volunteering in the community and other family chores little known for their ability to cheer up somebody (Tamar A1).
From experience it is definitely right to point out that boys are more likely to act in an irresponsible manner when faced by emotional difficulties are suggested by material in this survey. Boys on campus come up with grisly activities like riots, arson and other ways through which property is destroyed just to express their emotions. Girls on this occasion are known to act with much calm and understanding. The eventual diversification of interests as pertains to this study has further implications in determining the authenticity of the topic of emotional health decline. In the survey Professor of Education at U.C.L.A. Linda Sax states that "the gap between men and women on emotional well being was one of the largest in the survey. Considering that her survey was mainly for the purpose of gender statistics, this blending of two different fields in the study is enough proof for the existence of emotional health problems amongst freshmen and in this case female students.
She goes further in describing the supposed relationship between the faculty and the students from which it is observed that women tend to be outstanding in this field despite the fact that negative effects on their relationship with the faculty completely stained their perceptions and thus led to a crash in mental stability. The survey also proves that women's perception of emotional peak performance was "closely tied to how the faculty treated them." That means "it was not so much the level of contact as whether they felt they were being taken seriously by the faculty" (Tamar A1). This trends is unlike the one manifested by boys under the same environment and also the tendency of boys taking their professors to task by asking questions hereby said to reduce stress by great amounts. For females the issue turns out to be a conformation to their decline in emotional well being and in turn generating more disorders to their mental status.
Apart from the annual survey being quite effective due to its engagement and the time invested in it, there happens to be several shortcomings arising from its methodology. Having to ask students to come up with answers on their emotional health can be disastrous in terms of accuracy. The result is more likely to be misinterpreted since each student might come up with a different insight considering the inner feelings and their relation to emotional wellbeing. We certainly must expect conflicting results since students cannot be trusted to come up with the best argument. The exercise will most definitely be marred by students confusing self imposed conditions for emotional health problems. On the other hand comparison and assessment of other students' mental health remains a matter that can easily be handled by professionals and not students. The other aspect that raises ones eyebrows in relation to the survey is the fact that even as the students', emotional health, which is directly related to their mental ability, was on the decline, their achievement in class was shooting up suggesting that the methods used were somehow ineffective. On the other hand the survey provides limited solid evidence as to how ladies are the most vulnerable to emotional health decline.
In conclusion, it is clear that very few people in the world today can portray a perfect example of a sound emotional status. Everyone becomes victim to this disorder at one point or the other due to the magnitude of activities hanging on to his or her mental fabric. Therefore since "students know their generation is less likely to be successful than their parents", the pressure felt in the hunt for success is enormous (Tamar A1). The other challenge involves the ever diminishing value of a college degree in the job market and the need to acquire an M.B.A or a PhD. These aspects are bound to affect students just like other human beings and owing to economic hardships, futuristic dilemmas and gender implications as depicted in the survey, it is therefore appropriate to support a thesis statement implying that freshmen's emotional stability is on the decrease.