Free Leadership Styles Essay Sample
Buy Cheap Leadership Styles Essay
Leadership style refers to a method and procedure of offering direction, execution plans, and motivating individuals. Leadership and management require appropriate skills to be carried out effectively and in the most appropriate way to achieve their intended goals and purpose. They are based on various theories and assumptions, and style that a person applies is depended on a collection of their values, beliefs, and preferences alongside the company’s norms and culture that will motivate some methods and discourage some. In essence, the different styles seem to contradict each other, but an effective leader always knows which approach to apply and when.
Healthcare delivery systems are intricate units, which should merge most of the clinical and administrative practices into a current model of leadership if enhancements of patient results are to be developed. Resolving patient care errors, which adds to the avoidable deaths, has been an objective for over a decade, yet nothing has been successful in modifying the patterns. The health practitioners are believed to be highly trained in their various fields, but events still occur because of lack of proper coordination and leadership among them. The medical error incidents that result to deaths may be avoided with application of considerate leadership and management styles. Such events require health practitioners to be extra careful because they are dealing with people’s lives. However, there is a developing recognition and need that health care institutional leaders across the globe collaborate with clinical leaders to oversee the safety of patients, evidence depended activities, capacity, and financial sustainability; nevertheless, tension between the teams stands (Bogue, et. al., 2009).
Healthcare is depended in vast, bureaucratic units arranged in administrative structures with a product or clinical line silos, which hinder collaboration, restrict inter-disciplinary involvement, and encourage mistrust. In reaction to these current demands, healthcare institutions across the world are working on to handle the “how” of incorporating clinicians efficiency in patient management with the financial necessities of current day delivery structures. Three basic strategies proposed are execution of distributed or clinical leadership models, support for frontline clinical empowerment to create changes, and development of clinical leadership in institutions (Stoller, 2008).
Shared governance is an institutional innovation, which provides healthcare professionals power over their patients and progress their impact into administrative fields, formerly led just by managers. Leadership designs take various types and have different powers based on the institutional context that they are executed. Classically, these mediums oversee activities’ guidance, protocols, and policies. A number of leadership units function outside the field of line management and serve as proposed agencies instead of having power to implement change. Whereas distributed or clinical leadership has been linked with raised job satisfaction and nurse empowerment, remarkably few researches have been carried out to assess the influence of this style on patient results, or safety (Edmondstone, 2009).
On the other hand, bureaucratic leadership has proposed the liberation of frontline personnel. This transformation ensures that nurses at bedside pilot concepts and skills to enhance safety and raise patient-oriented care deliver. Reduced hospital acquired infection, rapid response groups, and enhanced results for surgical patients are entire innovations encouraged by this leadership. The leaders and researchers advocating for overhaul of frontline and empowerment of nurses propose that if the healthcare personnel get the resources, training, and power from the leaders would deliver improved safety and patient care procedures on hospitals patient cells. Leaders should promote togetherness in this field and ensure willingness coordination as critical dimensions of modifying frontline habits, and that lack of administrative obligation usually leads to variables (Stoller, 2008).
Central to this leadership of empowering frontline groups is keeping the authority to execute a change without a proposal to be channeled through bureaucracy, and waiting for appropriate decisions. Furthermore, in spite of education to aid the nursing’s application of proof depended practice at the cell level, usually it is not optimized due to limitations on the nurse’s functions in offering patient care. There is a concept that nurses are trained to observe proof, think intelligently and logically, and make decisions depending on their skills, yet they are not permitted to carry out their jobs. Appropriate healthcare leadership will ensure clinicians get enough resources and time to concentrate on evidence depended practice executions, provided the requirements of patients lies on the personnel (Edmondstone, 2009).
The other approach that may be applied to resolve the imbalance between administrative and clinicians in healthcare decision-making is the concentration of raising the number and efficiency of clinical leaders. This effort will focus on both nurse and physician leadership growth. It is likely considerate to acknowledge that current years have conceivably experience an excess of centralism and managerialism, which has disenchanted most frontline personnel. To react to this ideality, the medical professionals recommend an aggressive recruitment of leaders. They will then be organized under medical leadership to ensure the safety of everyone as that of their patients. This will facilitate and widen the support of involvement and innovation of peer physicians (Bogue, et. al., 2009).
Most healthcare structures still apply leadership models from the industrial age that the concentration is on administrative functions, instead of designing leadership as a procedure, which supports collectiveness required for the information age. Current times require current approaches to ensure smooth running and coordination of resources and activities. Post-industrial leadership designs are valued-depended, relational, and sustain a desire to tap into the joined wisdom of participants of the institutions. Leadership in all areas is transforming from concentration on a person to one, which states leadership as a procedure. In this modern context, leadership growth is an incorporation plan, which supports cooperation, interaction, and attainment of common objectives.