Free Traffic Violation Essay Sample
|← The Use of Animals in Research||Humanitarian Intervention →|
Buy Cheap Traffic Violation Essay
The main reason for this data gathering is to find out the level of risks about bad driving habits among the teenagers (school students). Most of these teenagers are students who violate the traffic codes and rules; hence they are the victims of accidents. 55% of these cases are caused by students who drive when they are drag racing, driving when drunk and because of euphoria so as to become a hero, reckless driving and lack of the required qualifications as a qualified driver.
Most of the students drivers examined admitted that they have been involved in the traffic violation several times. The most contributing factor to the young people driving problems is the lack of is lack of driving experience, impatience and failure to be keen when driving. The youths want to be driven by emotions that; once they have completed driving school classes, they are now qualified and experience. Crashing of the vehicle is higher in youths than adults above 35 years (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
All this information was obtained by use of questionnaire method of collecting information and data. The 1430 driver students who participated in the training program were each distributed with questionnaires to fill and give their opinions and views. There were several questions asking the drivers (students) what are the major causes, effects and solutions to traffic violation. The students were to list the major causes of accidents such as over speeding, drunk drivers and sleepy drivers (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The 880 students are those who may have violated the traffic codes and want to further train so as not to repeat the same mistakes in future. This group has already known the severe consequences of traffic violation. The procedure used was that, all the participants were not to fill the survey form if they were uncomfortable with it. However, all were suppose to attend all seminar sessions on driving behavior. The questionnaires were to respond to the speed they recommend fit and safe to drive at. It was driver's training program for students from Southern California because this was one of the regions experiencing many traffic violations.
Results and findings
It was found out from the assessment of what went on in the training that; students who drink and drive endanger their lives and other people's as well. Students are led by emotions in that they can drive when drunk; engage in reckless driving and drag racing. Because most of these students are unconscious due to influence of drugs and alcohol, they may not tighten their seatbelts (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The female drivers were found to be more dangerous when they drive than their male counterparts. The males believe that they are more skillful, keen and careful than female drivers. This leads to gender psychology where such diversities would lead to some problem solving strategies to deal with the traffic menace. Females drive for fun; hence they may cause more accidents than males. Most of the participants had to undergo driving training program because they have been victims of over speeding and carelessness. These participants in the training voted that, sleepy and drank drivers were more dangerous while slow drivers were careful and rarely do they cause accidents (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
Most females voted angry driving, sleepy driving and drunk driving as more dangerous than the males. Almost all males and females blame the cause of all these driving problems on their parents. They were all in unison that, their parents are aggressive, abusive and not understanding which has caused many youths to be defiant and lack of concentration while driving (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The difference between these two groups of traffic violators and student drivers is that, those who don't drive believe that, angry driving, sleepy driving and drunk driving are dangerous compared to the people in the second group (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The pros or advantages of this article according to the analysis are that, it will help reduce the cases of accidents caused due to carelessness. The first pro is the advice on the use of the phones while driving. The article clearly explains why drivers should not use the phones while driving. According to the article, drivers who don't use their phones while driving are less likely to cause accidents; hence cannot violate traffic codes (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The cons of this article are quite clear. The traffic offenders could not have been included in the training program. The major reason for this is that, by not allowing them to attend, it may lead to more traffic violations and road accidents. This means that, they be allowed to attend the traffic for them to be trained to be more keen and careful while driving. The traffic violators could not cover all categories of traffic violators at the course of training. The best thing they could have done was to include all the traffic violators in the sample for training. By omitting the most serious cases associated with traffic violation and road accidents would not help improve the general safety in the roads (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004). For sanity to be restored and to reduce traffic violation, all stakeholders must be included. By providing adequate information to all drivers would give a clue on how to solve some of these problems. Mixed trainings may not solve problems because both the males and females have their own vested interests on the whole issue.
In this research, accidents occur because some drivers have accepted such driving risky behavior which endangers their lives. Traffic violators and non drivers can engage in risky driving if they are exposed to risky driving behaviors themselves. The authors of this article were trying to educate the young drivers of the safety measures they are supposed to undertake so as promote and enhance their safety (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The participants in this drivers training program in South California had received speeding violation and some had been involved in serious accidents and other minor traffic offences. The author's aim was to reduce high rates of accidents among the youths who violate traffic codes and rules (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The data collected in the training program refuted the hypothesis that, the student's drivers should be careful when driving and be keen so as to enhance their safety. The hypotheses in question are how rules and regulation on traffic are administered by the traffic officers. The officers should enact laws (stringent rules and regulations) to punish and deter those who violate traffic rules and codes. Careless driving depends entirely on the violation of traffic rules.
Therefore, the current studies must be comprehensive and whoever does not adhere to it should be totally banned from driving so as to ensure sanity in our roads. In this article, the author wanted to know if the youths really understand that, traffic violation brings more harm not good to themselves and the community at large. Can the training on assessment of risks associated with passengers reduce accidents on the road?
After the training, the hypothetical results show that, traffic violation had reduced in youths who were the major culprits of traffic mess. This study suggests that, young non-drivers and traffic violators who are exposed to risky driving are likely to engage in risky driving themselves. The accidents happened to the drivers who have accepted risky driving behaviors due to their defiance to the authorities (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004).
The participants who had received speeding violations usually got crashes later on in their life. The authors tried to determine if understanding what teenager drivers thought about driving and risks could help reduce traffic accidents and violations (Sarkar and Andreas, 2004). The data refuted the hypothesis; young drivers should do more work such as studying more time in class or taking home plans to complete with parents, so that safety can be increased in the roads.
- Humanitarian Intervention
- The Cons of Weaponizing Space
- The Use of Animals in Research
- Population Growth