Free Separation of Head of State and Head of Government Roles Essay Sample
It is important that the roles of the head of state are be separated from those of the head of government because of the following reasons: Firstly, given the fact that the public focus their interests on the king and its royal family means that the head of the government is given a chance to perform his job without interference from the journalists and other intense public attention and scrutiny. Another reason why roles of the two leaders is that the head of state is separately elected into office by the public and his term is longer as compared to the head of government or the premier who is entitled to more executive and political power. The head of has limited powers and counsels the head of the government on some issues.
The roles of the head of state and head of government should be separated because it is believed that in democratic societies there is a head of the government who is responsible in guiding the government policy and he is the political leader of the state and the head of state that is basically the symbolic head of the government.
In addition to that, in parliamentary systems of government, the head of government is elected into office by the majority party in the legislature whereby the head of the state asks the successful head of government to serve as the prime minister in which he is responsible to writing the speech that is read by the head of the state during the opening of the parliamentary sessions. The head of state has no political powers at all and the prime ministers therefore perform the governmental functions and the head of the state symbolically represents the nation.
To delve deeper into the rationale behind the separation of roles, it's essential to recognize the historical context that often shapes these distinctions. Many democratic societies draw from constitutional traditions that evolved over centuries, creating a delicate balance between symbolic and executive functions. This historical foundation underscores the importance of preserving traditions while adapting to the changing needs of society.
In some constitutional monarchies, the head of state's role extends beyond symbolism to embody a continuity of the state itself. This continuity provides a sense of stability and national identity, especially during times of political transitions. The head of government, on the other hand, bears the brunt of day-to-day policy decisions, responding to the dynamic challenges of the contemporary political landscape.
Moreover, the longevity of the head of state's term is often intentional, offering a degree of insulation from short-term political pressures. This extended term allows the head of state to focus on broader, long-term national interests without being swayed by the ebb and flow of political cycles. In contrast, the head of government, with a shorter tenure, is more attuned to immediate concerns and responsive to the electorate's evolving demands.
Additionally, the symbolic nature of the head of state's position plays a crucial role in diplomacy. The head of state often represents the nation on the international stage, fostering diplomatic ties and cultural exchanges. This diplomatic role is distinct from the diplomatic functions of the head of government, who engages in negotiations and policy discussions with foreign counterparts.
In summary, the historical context, the longevity of the head of state's term, and the distinct diplomatic roles further emphasize the necessity of separating the head of state and head of government functions. This separation not only aligns with democratic principles but also reflects the nuanced evolution of governance structures over time.