Home
Process
Prices
Get a Discount
About Our Service
Guarantees
Free Essays
FAQ
Contact Us
Free Warning: Parental Advisory Essay Sample
The storyline of this movie revolves around two characters Dee Snider and Frank Zappa. These two characters give their views against the music and the laws that incorporate it. The story has great emphasis on how the Parents Music Resource Centre was invented and the effects it had on music back in 1985.
In this movie, the events based upon operation of disturbance theory include; the lawyer’s position which is presented by Priestly who sides with the American industry that is associated with recording music. According to the congressional representatives, it is perceived to be having vulgar content. Therefore, to spice up the movie, a group of rock stars characters are involved to ease the situation especially with the parents that are so concerned about the issue. The vital part of the message that is delivered to audience is that, restraint was only permitted when a person was mature enough to take care of his responsibilities as a parent.
When the movie ends, it is like a bizarre where Jason Priestley’s son is shown listening to music. In addition, the fact that Priestly is so much into rap music and the drug deals was an act, which to the society, was deemed indecent. This implies that the attitude people have against particular lyrics and cultures that appear to be offensive to them will repeat itself in the present and the future generations.
By then, the political entrepreneurs and patrons who were available included Jeremy Renner and Marlon Brando. Renner was devoted to theatre work where he got a chance to support series and movies that were featured on Television. Brando on the other hand, was known for concentrating on his talents, which landed him a position as the greatest actor in movies. To interest group politics, pluralism works in a way that causes biasness. In this case, particular organizations develop attitude towards others just by their voices and the black people are the ones who suffer most.
In the wake of the film's revelations, it's worth delving into the dynamic personas of Jeremy Renner and Marlon Brando within the political landscape. Renner, not only dedicated to theater work but also a fervent advocate for social causes, utilized his influence to support a myriad of television projects, including groundbreaking series that resonated with audiences across the nation. On the other hand, Marlon Brando's legacy extended beyond his acting prowess. His foray into political activism, notably during the Civil Rights era, showcased a multifaceted personality. Brando's impassioned stance on equality left an indelible mark on the intersection of art and politics.
Moreover, the film subtly explores the nuances of interest group politics, shedding light on the complexities of pluralism. It delves into how certain organizations form biases based on voices alone, drawing attention to the systemic challenges faced by marginalized communities. The black population, in particular, emerges as a focal point in the narrative, underscoring the disparities and prejudices ingrained in the sociopolitical fabric. As the movie reaches its denouement, the bizarre twist with Jason Priestley's son engrossed in controversial music serves as a poignant commentary on evolving societal norms. The juxtaposition of Priestley's fictitious involvement with rap music and drug deals challenges preconceived notions, urging viewers to question the judgments imposed on particular cultures and lyrics.
This cinematic exploration doesn't merely dwell on the past but serves as a mirror reflecting the perennial struggles of cultural clashes. It beckons the audience to confront the cyclical nature of societal attitudes, prompting a contemplation of the enduring impact these clashes have on shaping the perspectives of present and future generations.
