Free From in the Shadow of Man Summary Essay Sample

In analyzing anthropological behavior of chimpanzees in their natural habitats, Goodall preempts adaptation and recognition of an external factor in their order. She was able to pick a behavioral reaction after a continued presence in their habitat. The pro-longed stay at the peak shows recognition is after a period of interacting with the object, which in this context was the researcher herself. She was able investigate the group well after closing in at a safer distance. Devoid in this context means emptiness or lack of it; for instance summary statement, “the crown of his head, neck, and his shoulders were almost entirely devoid of hair”. Mr. Mc Gregor was old and was showing signs of aging a signal that he was the leader of the group. In devoid of, this phrase as used by researcher describes Flo who had fluff of hair on the back of her head. The researcher shows from the group that could pick their respective age and tell how they related with each other by observing physical traits, e.g. the size, roles, and command the order of the group. M r. McGregor’s behavior according to Latin word “bellinger” is advanced by his reaction to researcher’s intrusion. He would demonstrate upward and backward jerks of his head and shaking branches before restoring his normal self after; this behavior was advanced when the researcher was in close vicinity. Naming of the chimps is a result of anthropological resemblance and behavior similar to that of humans. Their actions and roles were different just as human’s roles are; thus it was easier to depict each of one of their traits, to a trait similar to the name given. Doodall describes William and Olly facial characteristics evidently linking them as brothers; they both had long upper lips that moving from side to side. The researcher here is moved and attaches known interactions to suit her study. This shows projection as this behavior might not have been consistent with the names, an idea which justifies use of numbers as earlier used. The word prime is used in this context, Goodall at the end discovered that Chimps were eating meat. The word prime is used to advance a fact that is of most importance in a situation. In the text, it depicts how chimpanzees were sharing meat with the young ones and the behavior of the males chewing the flesh with some leave. This observation changed the whole spectrum of the observation and propelled the researcher interest in observing further such a drastic change of behavior that was not picked from earlier studies. This foundation refutes empirical deductions that Chimps are purely vegetarians. The observations from the researcher revealed that the chimpanzees were eating meat. Previous observers in the west and Africa had seen chimpanzees use objects and tools, they opened nut kernels using rocks, and sticks to get honey from bees nest. In this context, the word Frond is used as a leafy word used by chimps in feeding; it has an edge divided into lots of thin parts.

The main idea behind this study is anthropological in nature. From the context, the investigations from the researcher would advance similarities of these primates under study. However, his last observations that chimpanzees be accepted as man, is far-fetched. The article depicts an anthropological study of humans. Clearly, I cannot rule out misunderstandings from earlier studies, as all observations were not repetitive, a reason to grant the research a longer period to derive a clear perspective, empirically. The observational tool is held with skepticism, as a unit under study may change behavior because of external factors. The researcher has the same feelings. However, the summary is useful historically in tracing evolution, as advancement of these primates has been studied and further evolving proofed futile.