Free Cognitive Psychology Essay Sample
Ochsner, K. and Lieberman, M. in their article 'The emergence of cognitive neuroscience' bring out the vivid relationship between the three common levels of analysis of interactions: the cognitive level which deals with the processing of information, the social level, which is concerned with the social and motivational factors which enable people to relate well in the environment and the neutral level, which is concerned with the development of the brain and cognition. The article begins by giving an overview of the cognitive neuroscience in general, it then reviews current research questions on the subject where the previous methods, hypothesis, design and procedures have been discussed in detail. Before giving a concrete conclusion, the author has discussed the future implications of the subject under discussion.
The article is dated September, 2001 although it still gives the most common facts which exist between the three levels of interactions in human beings. The purpose of the research which the authors have discussed in detail in their current research is to be able to establish as to whether there is really a relationship between the cognitive development and the social and neutral factors in an individual. The article further seeks to establish the extend of this relationship. The method which was utilized in the research was the longitudinal study, where the previous data was used to infer into the current developments. The main discussion and findings is the establishment of the validity of cognitive neuroscience research.
Delving deeper into the specifics of the longitudinal study employed by Ochsner and Lieberman, it would be insightful to explore the duration of the study and whether there were distinct developmental milestones or critical periods that emerged in their analysis. Understanding the temporal intricacies could uncover patterns of cognitive evolution that might have implications for educational practices and interventions.
Considering the intricate nature of the cognitive-social-neural triad, it would be valuable to investigate if the researchers examined potential moderating variables. For instance, did they explore whether the impact of social factors on cognitive development varied based on individual differences or environmental contexts? Unraveling these potential moderating influences could contribute to a more nuanced comprehension of the relationship dynamics between these different levels of analysis.
Furthermore, the article alludes to the practical implications of the findings for parents, teachers, and students. Expanding on this, one might inquire about the specific types of cognitive exercises or interventions that were suggested based on the study's outcomes. Understanding the practical applications can provide actionable insights for educators and parents keen on fostering optimal cognitive development in children.
In terms of future directions, has there been an expansion of research methodologies in cognitive neuroscience beyond longitudinal studies? Exploring whether new technologies or interdisciplinary approaches have influenced the field since Ochsner and Lieberman's work could shed light on the evolving landscape of cognitive neuroscience research.
To sum up, exploring the duration and milestones of the longitudinal study, investigating potential moderating variables, understanding practical implications for stakeholders, and examining the evolution of research methodologies are avenues for further elaboration in the discourse on cognitive neuroscience.